nhi.sgit.ai / documents / pull-the-plug
Who Can Pull The Plug: The Plug Always Exists; The Questions Are Who, Blast Radius, Speed, Side Effects, And What Cannot Be Recovered
Summary
The series-defining brief: the plug almost always exists, so the question is never whether one exists but the profile of pulling it — who, blast radius, speed, side effects, recoverability. Recoverability is the hard limit money cannot cross: a risk with an irreversible outcome is a different object from a recoverable one. Agents removed the slow-consequence tolerance that let organisations defer these questions, which is the why-now — this is not an AI governance problem but the governance organisations never built, exposed by agents.
Key concepts
- The plug profile — five dimensions: who, blast radius, speed, side effects, recoverability — AOMM Level 4 is this profile, tested
- Recoverability as the hard limit — what cannot be undone must be governed by prevention and the most senior acceptance
Key ideas
- The old binary of no-plug-to-pull was really recoverability being zero.
- The question is the best front door to the acceptance machinery because it is concrete, honest, and exposes the gap.
- Plug-profile completeness is a maturity probe, computed from evidence rather than claimed.
On this site
Curated under 'who can pull the plug?' in the collection; composes with the AOMM at Level 4 (Contained).
Infographic
Slot reserved. The matching LinkedIn infographic has not yet been linked — the request list is on the infographics page (N1 on comms). Once identified it will appear here, pointing back to this document.
Read the document
📄 Original document · v0.33.51 · 24 July 2026 · rendered from the raw markdown (the source of truth)